Mr. Trump acknowledged downplaying the threat, arguing that he didn’t want to cause panic

Mr. Trump acknowledged downplaying the threat, arguing that he didn’t want to cause panic and send prices soaring

Novel Coronavirus endangers U.S. President Donald Trump admitted Wednesday that in an interview with Washington Post senior correspondent Bob Woodward earlier this year, he knew that novel Coronavirus was a threat but played down the threat. Mr Trump argued that he did not want to cause panic and soaring prices.

Joe Biden, Mr Trump’s rival for the Democratic presidential nomination, accused Mr Trump of betraying the American people and “bordering on criminal”. Many in the media also criticized Woodward for failing to inform the public of the seriousness of the epidemic in order to promote his book.

Trying to

Mr Trump learned earlier this year that coVID-19 was a dangerous virus

Woodward, who worked on the Watergate scandal, is scheduled to publish a new book on June 15 that includes 18 interviews with Trump from December to July, as well as background interviews with people familiar with the matter. Novel Coronavirus (VIRUS) was a novel virus that Trump learned about earlier this year, according to a transcript of an interview with CNN first released on Tuesday.

“I always want to downplay [the threat],” Mr Trump told Mr Woodward on March 19. I’m still willing to do it because I don’t want to create panic.” He had learned on February 7 that novel Coronavirus could be airborne and more deadly than a flu virus.

According to a new book released by the Washington Post, even as early as January 28, Presidential National Security Aide Robert O ‘Brien warned Trump that novel Coronavirus would be the “greatest national security threat” of his presidency. But Trump told Woodward in May that he did not remember that.

Trump insisted at a White House press conference on Saturday that he was right not to make the threat of the epidemic public. “We don’t want to inject panic… I’m actually a cheerleader for this country… I’m certainly not going to make the country or the world crazy.” Nor does he want to “let prices soar to almost unaffordable levels”.

Anthony Fauci, a US epidemiologist and key member of the White House coronavirus response task Force, appeared to defend Trump On Thursday, AFP reported. He told Fox News that Trump “usually wants to… Make sure the country doesn’t get into trouble, “he says.” But I don’t remember telling him things that were seriously distorted.”

White House press secretary Kelly McNerney said the same day that Trump had never lied or misled the public and had “never played down” the virus threat. Many media outlets have pointed out that this contradicts the President himself.

Republican Senator Lindsey Graham told Reuters that Trump was “right” when he decided to shut down the economy. “I think the tone of the conversation at the time speaks for itself.” Several other Republicans contacted by the AP declined to comment.

Invite lambasting

About two-thirds of Americans are dissatisfied with the government’s response

The US is now the world’s worst-hit country, with the highest number of confirmed cases and deaths. At the very least, According to AGence France-Presse, Mr Trump has delivered a “mixed message” as the US seeks uniform guidelines for fighting the pandemic. He initially presented himself as the equivalent of a wartime President, but his subsequent public statements contradicted those of medical and public health experts serving the government and repeatedly called for an early restart of the economy.

Trump said on February 26 that the number of confirmed cases in the United States would “drop to near zero” and on February 27 that the virus would “miraculously” disappear, bloomberg news noted. On March 9th he told people to keep their social distance, saying that the death rate from coVID-19 was similar to the flu and that “life and the economy will go on”. After talking for all of March about ending vaccination efforts by Easter, he abruptly warned sternly at the end of the month that the coronavirus could cause 100,000 deaths.

Agence France-Presse said Woodward’s book could put new pressure on Trump about eight weeks before the November 3 presidential election. Recent polls show that about two-thirds of Americans disapprove of the government’s response to the epidemic. Many critics have accused Mr Trump of trying to play down the threat of the epidemic in order to secure a second term.

Joe Biden, a Democrat, quickly took the opportunity to take a shot at Mr Trump. He said during a campaign stop in Michigan that Trump had knowingly lied to the American people for months about the threat of the epidemic. “It’s a betrayal of life and death… Dereliction of duty. He also told CNN that Mr Trump’s behaviour was “disgusting… It borders on crime. The Biden campaign also ran an AD on Saturday night, stressing that Trump “always knew [the danger].”

The exposure time

Failing to inform people of the seriousness of the epidemic in a timely manner in order to promote a new book

While U.S. public opinion has focused on Trump’s comments, many have questioned the timing of Woodward’s interview, criticizing the veteran journalist for putting promotion of his book ahead of public health.

Charles Pierce of Esquire said on Twitter that nearly 200,000 Americans were killed simply because neither Trump nor Woodward was willing to take significant risks to keep the entire country informed. David Boardman, dean of temple University’s School of Communication, said it was “routine” for Woodward to wait for the book’s release to reveal what he knew, but whether it was still ethical to do so “in today’s life-or-death situation” was “open to debate”.

Woodward himself told the Associated Press that the interview had not been published because he had not been able to verify the President’s claims until May. Even if he had published the report in February, “we couldn’t tell people what we found out later.” “That’s my line of demarcation,” he said, urging disclosure before the election. Photo/Xinhua


Fauci denied that child vaccination advice was under the control of officials

Xinhua (Xinhua) — Anthony Fauci, an important member of the White House Coronavirus Response task Force, said on September 9 that his colleagues had suggested that he play down to the public the risk of children infected with coronavirus and the need for children to wear masks.

“I’m not told what to say and what not to say,” Fauci told Politico the same day. “I speak only about the scientific evidence.” Fauci has been director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, part of the NATIONAL Institutes of Health, for nearly 40 years.

Emails obtained by Politico show that Paul Alexander, a senior adviser to the Department of Health and Human Services, “guided” the NIH press staff on how Fauci spoke to the media. Alexander, a former adjunct professor at Canada’s McMaster University, was named a senior adviser in March by U.S. Assistant Secretary of Health Michael Caputo, who handles public relations.

In an Aug. 27 email, Mr. Alexander stated that he had reservations about novel Coronavirus tests on multiple occasions for children and even college students and that he had “a serious disagreement with Dr. Fauci on this matter.” The email was intended as a response to a news staff summary of points fauci had made in his interview with Bloomberg news. Alexander also informed Fauci’s news team On Monday that fauci should not advocate wearing face masks in an interview with MSNBC.

Fauci said he had never seen the emails.

According to Politico, Alexander’s opinions often clash with mainstream scientific opinion, even though they appear to be academic arguments. His “lengthy” emails are the latest indication that the White House and health department officials appointed by President Donald Trump are pushing health agencies to promote politics rather than science.

More than 510,000 confirmed cases of coVID-19 in children were reported in the United States as of Sept. 3, according to a new report by the American Academy of Pediatrics and the Children’s Hospital Association. In the two weeks of August 20th, solstice, and September 3rd, there was a surge of about 70,000 cases among children.

Alexander also told NIH staff on Aug. 27 that there was no reason to test people who did not show coVID-19 symptoms, according to the email. But public health experts believe that testing asymptomatic patients is essential to prevent novel Coronavirus from spreading.

Alexander also criticized the NIH Aug. 21 for sticking to standards for randomized controlled trials. Two days later, over the objections of Fauci and Francis Collins, the director of the National Institutes of Health, the FOOD and Drug Administration authorized the emergency use of plasma therapy for coVID-19 patients. Both Fauci and Collins are concerned that the effectiveness of the treatment has not been definitively proven in clinical trials.

[Editor: Wang Yu]


Disclaimer: The purpose of this article is to convey more information. If there is a source marked wrong or violated your legitimate rights and interests, please author ownership proof and this network contact, we will promptly correct, delete, thank you. Email address: